User talk:Sanqui

Oh no, administrator!

You're an administrator now because, you know, you contribute a lot and can help clean up messes. That means:

Protips for blocking!

• Expiry: Infinite (for obvious vandalism, otherwise let me know)
• Reason: Be creative
• Options:
  • Prevent account creation
  • Automatically block the last IP address used by this user, and any subsequent IPs they try to edit from
  • Prevent user from sending e-mail
  • Watch this user's user and talk pages (don't bother with this one)

Use it wisely! --Xkeeper 16:35, 17 May 2010 (EDT)

Yay! Thanks a lot. I'll make sure to take care of the wiki when you're away~ --Sanky ~ talk 16:42, 17 May 2010 (EDT)

Block this idiot

User:EPICKID46. Three edits thus far, two to Minecraft which were both shit edits, and a third to some Daffy Duck game where he replaced a chunk of text with DERPADERPADERPAAAAADERPADERPAAAA. Fire away! 404: User Not Found ^(talk) 07:41, 10 October 2013 (EDT)

Thanks for handling the situation :) 404: User Not Found ^(talk) 07:57, 10 October 2013 (EDT)

No probs. I was going to revert the MC edits and post something anyway, but I got distracted before you poked me. :P Sanky ~ talk 08:00, 10 October 2013 (EDT)

In cases of blatant vandalism like this, block first and ask questions later. There's no point in warning these people, and I don't want them on this wiki. --BMF54123 (talk) 14:19, 10 October 2013 (EDT)

Thanks

I forgot to thank you for making source work properly on Pokémon Gold and Silver, it's not much, but I didn't want to come across rude. I'll remember to try 1= if it doesn't work next time. :) Torchickens (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2014 (EDT)

Oh, no problem, I just happened to be around to see it. Also, I see I forgot to remove the comment of yours, whoops. :P

And, I guess what you said in the summary is correct. It's been a while since I went through the bug in the debugger. — Sanky ~ talk 12:57, 16 March 2014 (EDT)

About your revertion

I received an order to take down this part. The reasons are the following:
1. Posting private discussions without granted permission.
2. Degrading reputation to companies.
3. Putting people in serious problems.

I would kindly ask to remove that entire part again, or we will contact a lawyer about this case.

- theunknown

Hello theunknown,

we don't generally remove information from anywhere without a very good reason (this is a site about preservation, anyway), so I reverted your edit. Even if I let you remove the part, it would stay in the history, which, if you have a good reason, is unfavorable. I have contacted administrators who are more capable of handling this situation, so please wait until they will review your case. -- Sanky ~ talk 08:15, 23 March 2014 (EDT)