If you appreciate the work done within the wiki, please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support!

Template talk:Disney series

From The Cutting Room Floor
Jump to navigation Jump to search

So why aren't Disney's acquisitions listed in "See also"?

If this is because the administration of this wiki wants to keep that listing focused on the Disney brand and not the Disney company (and Bob Iger's hunger for IPs), I can perfectly understand that.

Even that is the case, I still say the Muppets should be thrown in: well, not only are the 2011 Muppets movie and Muppets Most Wanted blatantly branded as Disney flicks, but Muppet movies made during Jim Henson's life and thus long before Mr. Eisner got his grubby hands on Kermit are being retroactively branded as Disney movies; under that logic, their games should be also tossed in under the Disney umbrella.

As for Marvel, it'll be impossible to hide the fact when one will make a Disney Infinity 2.0 page that the main selling point (or should it be toys?) of that game is not Disney but Marvel, and thus the explicit acknowledgement of Marvel under the Disney banner. 'course, it could easily be fudged up as just a crossover between two unrelated brands...

On the subject of Star Wars, I suppose it might be better to wait and see how Star Wars Episode VII will be branded. Pikawil (talk) 00:04, 25 June 2014 (EDT)

If this is because the administration of this wiki wants to keep that listing focused on the Disney brand and not the Disney company (and Bob Iger's hunger for IPs), I can perfectly understand that.
That's how I see it, yes. If you want to add any series that are explicitly labeled "Disney," then go ahead, I guess. --BMF54123 (talk) 00:07, 25 June 2014 (EDT)