If you appreciate the work done within the wiki, please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support!

Talk:Oh Shit!

From The Cutting Room Floor
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is the talk page for Oh Shit!.
  • Sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
  • Put new text below old text.
  • Indent replies by prefixing with a colon :
  • Add new sections with the 'Add topic' button at the top right.
  • Be polite.
  • Assume good faith.
  • Don't delete discussions.
  • Be familiar with the talk help page.

Earliest version?

Apparently there's a version of the game simply titled "Shit!", which has a different title screen and predates both "Oh Shit!" and "Oh No!". Would anybody happen to have a copy of it so that it can be documented?

On a semi-related note, the death screens for "Oh Shit!" and "Oh No!" are different, but aren't documented in the differences section. --Murnjendoof (talk) 10:23, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

"Shit!" and "Oh Shit!" are the exact same ROM. Pgj1997 (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
That's odd, because I remember the manual for "Shit!" including an image of a title screen that looks very different to that of "Oh Shit!" --Murnjendoof (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
You're probably misremembering, then Pgj1997 (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

NSFW reason edit

Can someone please explain why removing the use of 2nd voice - something that, outside of direct quotes, should never appear in a wiki - and replacing it with an actual description of the NSFW content is so controversial here? Jtrevor99 (talk) 13:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC) If you don't like what I came up with, find some wording yourself that actually describes the content and doesn't use "you". That's all I care about. Jtrevor99 (talk) 13:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

…does it really need to be said that a game titled "Oh Shit" will feature rude language? It speaks for itself, really. N. Onymous (talk) 14:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

I think you're failing to realise that tcrf is a bit more casual than other wikis when it comes to stuff like this. That's why the opening paragraphs of most articles contain jokes and/or subjective assessments of the games' quality. Use of second-person voice in this context is perfectly fine by tcrf's rules. Does that clear up any confusion? --Murnjendoof (talk) 14:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm just trying to introduce some consistency with the other articles. I really don't care that much. I'm not sure why other people seem to care so much about not actually providing useful information in the warning, but whatever. Jtrevor99 (talk) 15:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
...as stated earlier, the article's title provides enough "useful information" already. For this reason, it's acceptable to have a little fun with the content warning. --Murnjendoof (talk) 15:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
We're not going to agree on that point. I'm not going to try to change it again - as I mentioned, it's really not worth fighting over - but I don't agree with how it stands. Jtrevor99 (talk) 15:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)